- Aug 25, 2018
- 964
- 682
- 113
I don't like this guy... just watched him once a couple of days ago and couldn't hold it for minutes...
I liked the detailed video. Thanks for the share.I don't like this guy... just watched him once a couple of days ago and couldn't hold it for minutes...
IDK why![]()
Thanks for useful selectionHere is an excellent 2hrs 15 mins long excellent in-depth tutorial on the Bricks Builder 1.5
Download Bricks Builder v1.5.1-rc - Build WordPress Sites That Rank Nulled
Aug 30th, 2022 - Release v1.5.1-rc
As this version contains many significant styling-related changes, we decided to first do a quick RC release. Which you can now manually download from your Bricks account for testing & bug reporting using the following link: https://bricksbuilder.io/account/?v=1.5.1-rc
Full v1.5.1-rc changelog can be found here as too lengthy to list fully here.
[URL...
Thanks @nivritobobsmith updated Bricks Builder - Build WordPress Sites That Rank with a new update entry:
Bricks Builder v1.5.1-rc Nulled
Read the rest of this update entry...
Yes its not final its RC so people dont get confused...thats not 1.5.1 its Version: 1.5.1-rc and thats a major difference
thats not 1.5.1 its Version: 1.5.1-rc and thats a major difference
Yes its not final its RC so people dont get confused...
I did actually read and not just glance over it, and it clearly statesWe all know it is release candidate for v1.5.1.
If members actually read posts in thread instead of quick glancing they would see that....
As this version contains many significant styling-related changes, we decided to first do a quick RC release. Which you can now manually download from your Bricks account for testing & bug reporting using the following link: https://bricksbuilder.io/account/?v=1.5.1-rc
I did actually read and not just glance over it, and it clearly states
Bricks Builder - Build WordPress Sites That Rank v1.5.1
As this version contains many significant styling-related changes, we decided to first do a quick RC release.
Who follows Bricks ... THey know... I assume you and me and many others know that!People read headings first, and many just scan through the body text, thus headings are very important to be accurate and specific. The heading text says v1.5.1. The correct way (IMO) would be specifying next to the version number that it's an RC. (v1.5.1 RC). But we're nitpicking!![]()