That's not true now is it, he started changing the files and giving partial source code in the latest version. He forced you to contact him to get the rest of the files. So no, he does not provide full source especially when its encrypted. As a developer when you buy full source code, you need to be able to change how ever you like.
No, the Violation rule was not discovered one month ago. I got to know from my some CodeCanyon Friend. He told me that He's violating the rule so then I reported.
Yes, Exactly. As per CodeCanyon rules you've to include all the files in the Zip only, nothing should be given personally and separately.
But you do understand that the issue stil exists and can't be let go, he still violates the rules and forces users to contact him to get encrypted files just for the source code to work,then comes security issues of not knowing what the code is doing. He might aswell steal credit cars info or force his ads on there and we wouldnt know because the files are encrypted. It has nothing to do about nulling the app anymore.. He got reported because he is doing wrong by the buyers.
Well your opinion appreciated but No need of such views as because File got reported as he Violated the rule of CodeCanyon not because we didn't able to make it null. So anyhow if I make it null still it violates the rule, So I shouldn't report it? Huh?
He is not providing full codes it is not his buyer's problem. I don't think that anyone has any problem who purchased the code, you can see items review.
Well I'm the buyer and I have problem now? Any word you more want to speak huh?
Well it's really great my dear author that you're using multiple ID's for replying the same thing for better results, but it's of no use.
Well, the thing is even the code is opensource, Author doesn't have any rights to give the files separately. If he really wants to protect his product then why didn't he used encryption inside the script itself and license verification system huh?
Well I'm not a Decryptor who can decrypt the code, I can null the code which is coded and humanly visible. So there's no point of my learning.
If you are a buyer then tell your problem to the author, if he does not fix then report.Well I'm the buyer and I have problem now? Any word you more want to speak huh?
Well it's really great my dear author that you're using multiple ID's for replying the same thing for better results, but it's of no use.
Well, the thing is even the code is opensource, Author doesn't have any rights to give the files separately. If he really wants to protect his product then why didn't he used encryption inside the script itself and license verification system huh?
Whole point of this sh** discussion is, His ass butt is hurt so just instead of replying from one ID, He's pointing his views with different ID's.
It's not the problem. It's the violation of rule of CodeCanyon so what's the purpose of reporting this to author huh?
