One Article I got from a content writer, don't ask the name, he claimed to have a unique article service, I have given him the keyword to write 2000+ words, he sent it back to me after few days. I thought the article is Copyscape passed, and yes, it is. Copyscape doesn't detect the sh** in a damn sentence, which pissed me off.
I was publishing that article, but suddenly it came to my mind that I should check the article on Quetext and other plagiarism-free services.
So here is the result:
1. Copyscape =Not detected
2. Quetext = 13% detected, and I checked from where I got the article.
3. Smallseotools = 2% detected, one sentence but it is not related to that keyword or article
I am not saying the Quetext is better than Copyscape because sometimes Quetext missed but Copyscape detected, sometimes the opposite.
So my 2 cents opinion is to better check the articles on different services to confirm the uniqueness of the article.
Those who only depend on Copyscape, are doing a big mistake here, consider other plagiarism checkers.
What is your opinion?
I was publishing that article, but suddenly it came to my mind that I should check the article on Quetext and other plagiarism-free services.
So here is the result:
1. Copyscape =
2. Quetext = 13% detected, and I checked from where I got the article.
3. Smallseotools = 2% detected, one sentence but it is not related to that keyword or article
I am not saying the Quetext is better than Copyscape because sometimes Quetext missed but Copyscape detected, sometimes the opposite.
So my 2 cents opinion is to better check the articles on different services to confirm the uniqueness of the article.
Those who only depend on Copyscape, are doing a big mistake here, consider other plagiarism checkers.
What is your opinion?
Last edited:
